Statements (42)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil rights case
01-7662 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
537 U.S. 322
|
| gptkbp:court |
Reversed and remanded
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 24, 2003 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
March 25, 2003
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Influenced jury selection reforms
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
The case highlighted issues of racial bias in the justice system.
Claims of racial discrimination in jury selection. The case involved jury selection issues. The case is often cited in discussions of jury discrimination. The ruling emphasized the importance of fair jury selection. The ruling was seen as a victory for civil rights advocates. The_case_was_appealed_to_the_Supreme_Court. The_decision_addressed_the_application_of_Batson_v._Kentucky. Miller-El_was_convicted_of_murder_in_Texas. The_Supreme_Court_reviewed_the_jury_selection_process. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Miller-El v. Cockrell
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Jury selection process
|
| gptkbp:involved |
Kerry_Miller-El
Rick_Cockrell |
| gptkbp:judges |
Justice Clarence Thomas
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Addressed racial discrimination in jury selection
Death penalty appeal Grant of habeas corpus |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
gptkb:NAACP_Legal_Defense_Fund
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union gptkb:National_Association_of_Criminal_Defense_Lawyers State of Texas Various legal scholars |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_David_Souter
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Influenced future cases on jury selection
Standard for evaluating juror bias |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_rights
Habeas corpus Equal protection clause Fourteenth Amendment rights |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Batson_v._Kentucky
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
6-3
|