|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
antitrust law
|
|
gptkbp:allegation
|
monopolistic practices
anti-competitive behavior
abuse of monopoly power
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.
|
|
gptkbp:appealsTo
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
gptkb:Legal_history_of_the_United_States
gptkb:United_States_antitrust_law
Technology law
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:253_F.3d_34_(D.C._Cir._2001)
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Microsoft
|
|
gptkbp:filingDate
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Columbia
gptkb:United_States_Department_of_Justice
May 18, 1998
20 U.S. states
|
|
gptkbp:focus
|
gptkb:Microsoft_Windows_operating_system
gptkb:Internet_Explorer_browser
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Microsoft antitrust case
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
influenced browser market competition
influenced software industry regulation
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Thomas_Penfield_Jackson
|
|
gptkbp:mediaCoverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Internet_Explorer
gptkb:Netscape
gptkb:Windows_98
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
Microsoft found to have violated antitrust laws
Microsoft not broken up
Microsoft ordered to share APIs with third-party companies
|
|
gptkbp:settlementPeriod
|
November 2001
|
|
gptkbp:settlementType
|
consent decree
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:European_Commission_v._Microsoft
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|