United States v. Microsoft Corp.
GPTKB entity
Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:advocacy |
against antitrust actions
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit
partial reversal |
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
ongoing antitrust discussions
|
| gptkbp:CEO |
gptkb:Bill_Gates
|
| gptkbp:claims |
monopolistic_practices
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
consumer choice
|
| gptkbp:competitors |
increased competition
challenged by competitors |
| gptkbp:countermeasures |
breakup_of_Microsoft_proposed
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Microsoft_Corporation
gptkb:United_States_District_Court gptkb:United_States_Department_of_Justice Microsoft_engaged_in_anti-competitive_behavior Microsoft's_monopoly_upheld |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2001
|
| gptkbp:duration |
1998 to 2004
|
| gptkbp:economy |
influenced market dynamics
|
| gptkbp:electronic_warfare |
innovation argument
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
rise of the internet
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
technology industry
|
| gptkbp:influence |
antitrust policy reforms
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Microsoft_Corporation
gptkb:United_States |
| gptkbp:is_a_platform_for |
Sherman Antitrust Act
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Thomas_Penfield_Jackson
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
delay tactics
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
David Boies
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
antitrust laws
|
| gptkbp:market |
over 90% in PC operating systems
predatory pricing scrutinized post-case. |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
shaped future antitrust cases
2004 settlement agreement regulatory scrutiny of tech companies |
| gptkbp:opened |
November 2004
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
increased software choices
Microsoft_found_to_have_violated_antitrust_laws Microsoft's_business_practices_monitored |
| gptkbp:packaging |
Windows with Internet Explorer
|
| gptkbp:paymentMethods |
compliance with antitrust regulations
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future antitrust enforcement
|
| gptkbp:products |
Windows and Internet Explorer
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
controversial case
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
damage control efforts
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:California_v._Microsoft_Corp.
May 18, 1998 |
| gptkbp:responseTime |
denial of wrongdoing
|
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark antitrust case
|
| gptkbp:strategicGoals |
bundling software products
|
| gptkbp:was_a_response_to |
appeal and compliance efforts
|