McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
GPTKB entity
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
13-402
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 2, 2014 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
October 8, 2013
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Civic engagement
Regulatory scrutiny Political discourse Campaign strategies Public trust in elections Political polarization Political accountability Voter engagement Election outcomes Grassroots fundraising Political advertising State campaign finance laws Political party funding Campaign finance advocacy Electoral competitiveness Campaign finance litigation Influence of wealthy donors Political donations transparency |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Campaign contributions
Political action committees Super PACs Increased individual contribution limits |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Freedom of speech
Campaign finance limits Influenced future campaign finance cases U.S._campaign_finance_law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Struck down aggregate contribution limits
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Citizens_United_v._FEC
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Controversial decision
Criticism from campaign finance reform advocates Support from libertarian groups |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Buckley_v._Valeo
gptkb:McConnell_v._FEC |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:First_Amendment
Campaign finance reform Political spending |
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
gptkb:Federal_Election_Commission
|
| gptkbp:signatories |
gptkb:Shaun_McCutcheon
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|