McCardle v. Haines

GPTKB entity

Properties (50)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf court case
gptkbp:caseOutcome significant for civil liberties
dismissed on procedural grounds
highlighted limitations of federal intervention
influenced future federalism debates
gptkbp:caseTypes civil rights case
No. 1
gptkbp:court gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
October Term, 1868
reaffirmed state sovereignty
decision based on statutory interpretation
limited federal court jurisdiction
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 1869
gptkbp:filedIn March 1869
gptkbp:historicalContext gptkb:post-Civil_War_America
gptkbp:historicalEvent part of a series of cases on federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:historicalSignificance reflects_tensions_in_Reconstruction
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label McCardle v. Haines
gptkbp:impact shaped future federal court cases
gptkbp:judges majority opinion emphasized state rights
dissent argued for broader federal powers
examined federal court powers
reaffirmed state court authority
dissent_by_Justice_Field
majority_opinion_by_Justice_Chase
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:legalStatus set a precedent for future cases
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
established limits on federal power
jurisdiction of federal courts
affected civil rights legislation
established principles of judicial restraint
federal jurisdiction limitations
influenced future interpretations of jurisdiction
questioned federal authority
represented by prominent lawyers
context_of_Reconstruction_policies
gptkbp:notableFeature analyzed by legal scholars
important for federalism
still cited in modern legal arguments
74 U.S. 315
gptkbp:outcome Supreme_Court_ruled_on_jurisdiction
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation Haines
McCardle
gptkbp:precedent influenced future cases
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Ex_parte_McCardle
gptkbp:relatedTo Reconstruction Acts
gptkbp:significance addressed Reconstruction-era issues
gptkbp:year 1869