Properties (90)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Analysis of judicial review impact.
Analysis of judicial significance impact. Analysis of legal context impact. Analysis of legal discussion impact. Analysis of legal framework impact. Analysis of legal implications impact. Analysis of legal precedents. Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Impact on future habeas corpus cases. Impact on judicial precedents. Impact on judicial review principles. Judicial impact on future cases. Significant for understanding judicial limits. The case was dismissed without a hearing. Impact_on_the_legal_framework_of_the_U.S. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Writ of habeas corpus
Analysis of judicial significance. Analysis of judicial precedent impact. Analysis of legal discussions. Analysis of legal implications. Analysis of the legal context. No specific case number assigned. |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
February 15, 1869. Influenced the interpretation of federal powers. Set a precedent for future jurisdictional cases. The decision was issued on February 15, 1869. Chief_Justice_Chase_and_Associate_Justices. Followed_standard_Supreme_Court_procedures. The_Supreme_Court_ruled_it_lacked_jurisdiction. |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:U.S._Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Influenced future interpretations of federal jurisdiction.
|
| gptkbp:hasAuthorityOver |
Analysis of judicial authority impact.
Analysis of judicial authority. Judicial authority examined in the ruling. Examined_the_authority_of_Congress_over_the_Supreme_Court. |
| gptkbp:hasLegalEvent |
Analysis of legal precedent impact.
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Frequently discussed in law reviews.
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Analysis of historical context impact.
Analysis of historical context. Related to the Reconstruction Acts. |
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Historical_significance_in_U.S._law.
Part_of_the_historical_development_of_U.S._law. Set_against_the_backdrop_of_Reconstruction. |
| gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
Important_for_understanding_post-Civil_War_legal_landscape.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Ex parte McCardle
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Judicial review
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
Influenced future legislative actions.
|
| gptkbp:involved |
William_McCardle
|
| gptkbp:judges |
No dissenting opinion was recorded.
The opinion emphasized jurisdictional limits. The case is often cited in discussions of judicial review. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
U.S._federal_jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Post-Civil_War_America
Constitutional law 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506 (1869) Raised questions about the separation of powers. Subject of ongoing legal debate. Contributed to the legal framework of habeas corpus. The_ruling_limited_the_Supreme_Court's_appellate_jurisdiction. McCardle_was_represented_by_attorney. Limits_on_Congress's_power_to_regulate_the_Supreme_Court. |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Reconstruction Acts of 1867.
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Documented in legal archives.
Analyzed in legal textbooks. Judgment was unanimous. Used as a case study in constitutional law courses. Examined the scope of judicial review. Still relevant in discussions of federal jurisdiction. Referenced_in_Supreme_Court_opinions. Highlighted_the_tension_between_Congress_and_the_Supreme_Court. Judicial_significance_in_the_context_of_Reconstruction. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court_dismissed_the_case
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Delivered_by_Chief_Justice_Salmon_P._Chase.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent cases regarding jurisdiction
Ex_parte_Yerger. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Implications for civil rights and liberties.
Related to cases involving habeas corpus. Contextualized_within_U.S._legal_history. |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Reconstruction Era
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Established_limits_on_Supreme_Court's_appellate_jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:team |
Established important legal precedents.
Legal implications for future cases. Part of the legal framework governing habeas corpus. Analysis of the legal framework. Analyzed in various legal commentaries. Discussed in legal circles. Significant for its implications on federalism. |
| gptkbp:year |
1869
|