|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:affects
|
taxpayer lawsuits
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Frothingham_v._Mellon
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:Flast_v._Cohen
262 U.S. 447
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1923-04-16
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
No. 657
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Andrew W. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Federal taxpayers do not have standing to challenge federal expenditures
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Massachusetts v. Mellon
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_George_Sutherland
|
|
gptkbp:numberOfIssues
|
taxpayer standing
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
standing doctrine in U.S. federal courts
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
No standing for generalized grievances
|
|
gptkbp:reaffirms
|
Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Frothingham_v._Mellon
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Tenth_Amendment
standing (law)
federal spending power
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Frothingham_v._Mellon
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|