Love v The Commonwealth; Thoms v The Commonwealth

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	High Court of Australia case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	Love; Thoms
gptkbp:application	gptkb:Brendan_Thoms gptkb:Daniel_Love
gptkbp:citation	[2020] HCA 3
gptkbp:country	gptkb:Australia
gptkbp:date	11 February 2020
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Gageler_J gptkb:Keane_J gptkb:Kiefel_CJ Mina J
gptkbp:heldBy	Aboriginal Australians cannot be considered 'aliens' under the Australian Constitution
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Love v The Commonwealth; Thoms v The Commonwealth
gptkbp:impact	Set precedent on the status of non-citizen Aboriginal Australians
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Bell_J gptkb:Edelman_J gptkb:Gordon_J gptkb:Nettle_J
gptkbp:principle	The concept of 'alien' in s 51(xix) of the Constitution does not apply to Aboriginal Australians
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Mabo_v_Queensland_(No_2) Shaw v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
gptkbp:response	The Commonwealth of Australia
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:citizenship gptkb:constitutional_law gptkb:Indigenous_Australians
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Love_v_Commonwealth;_Thoms_v_Commonwealth
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7