Landmark case in First Amendment law
GPTKB entity
Statements (56)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:affects |
gptkb:legislation
gptkb:civil_rights_movements gptkb:cultural_exchange gptkb:public_discourse gptkb:social_movements gptkb:diplomatic_relations gptkb:voter_turnout civic engagement public policy advertising practices community organizing government accountability individual rights human rights advocacy transparency in governance political activism public relations strategies judicial decisions whistleblower protections journalism practices media ethics international law discussions government practices nonprofit advocacy corporate speech global free speech issues |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:examines |
gptkb:political_debates
hate speech government censorship symbolic speech |
gptkbp:has_implications_for |
academic freedom
artistic expression political campaigns public protests media law social media regulation commercial speech religious expression |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Landmark case in First Amendment law
|
gptkbp:influences |
American civil liberties
|
gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:freedom_of_assembly
gptkb:freedom_of_religion freedom of speech freedom of the press freedom to petition the government |
gptkbp:is_analyzed_in |
constitutional law courses
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
subsequent legal cases
|
gptkbp:is_often_discussed_in |
law schools
|
gptkbp:is_often_referenced_in |
gptkb:political_debates
media discussions |
gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:First_Amendment
|
gptkbp:significance |
established legal precedents
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Employment_Division_v._Smith
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|