Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Institute_for_Justice_Arkansas
gptkb:Institute_for_Justice_California gptkb:Institute_for_Justice_Iowa gptkb:Institute_for_Justice_Louisiana gptkb:Institute_for_Justice_North_Carolina |
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced state constitutional amendments
affected urban redevelopment policies prompted discussions on property rights sparked debates on government power influenced public perception of government authority |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
June 23, 2005 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kelo v. New London
|
| gptkbp:impact |
led to legislative changes in some states
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
545 U. S. 469
125 S. Ct. 2655 162 L. Ed. 2d 439 |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:City_of_New_London
gptkb:Susette_Kelo |
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
rational basis review
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Souter
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Rehnquist gptkb:Justice_Stevens gptkb:Justice_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Breyer |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
eminent domain
private property rights public use requirement interpretation of 'public use' economic development justification balancing public and private interests federalism implications government's role in land use judicial review of legislative actions just compensation requirement state sovereignty in land use |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Hawaii_Housing_Authority_v._Midkiff
gptkb:Berman_v._Parker gptkb:City_of_New_London_v._Kelo |
| gptkbp:outcome |
5-4 decision
upheld the use of eminent domain for economic development |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future eminent domain cases
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_O'_Connor controversial decision increased awareness of property rights led to anti-eminent domain movements |
| gptkbp:significance |
expanded the interpretation of public use
|