Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff
GPTKB entity
Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
impact on judicial decisions
influence on public policy regarding land use details of the ruling land reform upheld |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil case
No. 83-1 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
467 U.S. 229
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 28, 1984 |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
land_ownership_in_Hawaii
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
historical significance in law
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
Hawaii's_housing_crisis
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff
|
| gptkbp:impact |
property rights
land use policy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
constitutional review |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
analysis of public use
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Hawaii_Attorney_General
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union eminent domain affirmed lower court's decision public use requirement influenced state laws on eminent domain Hawaii's_land_reform_program |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
summary of the case
influenced public policy critiqued by legal scholars reviewed in law journals discussed in legal circles arguments for and against eminent domain judgment of the court land reform implications relevant to property law Supreme_Court_ruling |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld_the_constitutionality_of_Hawaii's_land_reform_law
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:David_Midkiff
gptkb:Hawaii_Housing_Authority |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future eminent domain cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
gptkb:Penn_Central_Transportation_Co._v._New_York_City implications for landowners |
| gptkbp:significance |
expanded the interpretation of public use in eminent domain cases
|
| gptkbp:team |
set precedent for future cases
impact on legal standards established legal precedent analysis of the legal arguments discussion of legal principles legal framework of eminent domain legal outcome of the case |