Statements (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:area |
constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal
B 18 of 1995 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
gptkb:Kable_v_DPP_(NSW)_[1996]_HCA_24
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
struck down laws |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1996
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
doctrine of legality
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
Kable
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kable v DPP (NSW)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced legislative reforms
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Callinan
gptkb:Justice_Kirby gptkb:Justice_Hayne gptkb:Justice_McHugh Justice Gummow 5-2 decision 12 June 1996 |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
separation of powers
constitutionality of preventive detention |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
barristers_for_DPP
barristers_for_Kable |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
human rights
judicial independence due process executive power |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Crimes_Act_1900_(NSW)
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
public safety
legal reasoning public interest government accountability legal frameworks judicial review civil liberties government powers legal protections legal accountability landmark case legal standards rights of the accused legal precedent constitutional challenges judicial interpretations judicial activism judicial precedents constitutional provisions constitutional interpretation legal implications statutory interpretation legislative intent separation of powers doctrine constitutional law principles legal doctrines executive discretion judicial review principles constitutional validity constitutional safeguards legislative supremacy judicial checks judicial limits |
| gptkbp:outcome |
invalidated legislation
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld)
|
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
gptkb:Director_of_Public_Prosecutions_(NSW)
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on state powers
|