Kable v DPP (NSW) [1996] HCA 24
GPTKB entity
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
judicial review
civil rights case high-profile case public law constitutional law case landmark decision criminal appeal constitutional challenge notable case important legal case precedent-setting case administrative appeal significant case seminal case |
| gptkbp:court |
unanimous decision
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
Kable
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kable v DPP (NSW) [1996] HCA 24
|
| gptkbp:impact |
on state legislation
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Callinan
gptkb:Justice_Kirby gptkb:Justice_Hayne gptkb:Justice_McHugh Justice Gummow Chief_Justice_Brennan |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:New_South_Wales
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
constitutional law separation of powers administrative law on human rights constitutional validity of legislation on executive power on judicial independence on legislative power |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
[1996] HCA 24
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
legislation declared invalid
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Kable_v_DPP_(NSW)_[2009]_HCA_24
Pochi_v_New_South_Wales R_v_McCloy Wainohu_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
gptkb:Director_of_Public_Prosecutions_(NSW)
|
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark_case_in_Australian_law
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
1996
|