Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	544 U.S. 167
gptkbp:date	2005-03-29
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Chief_Justice_William_Rehnquist gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkbp:heldBy	Retaliation against a person because they complained about sex discrimination is itself a form of intentional sex discrimination under Title IX.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education
gptkbp:legalIssue	retaliation under Title IX
gptkbp:location	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_David_Souter gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkbp:petitioner	Roderick Jackson
gptkbp:predecessor	retaliation claims under Title IX
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Davis_v._Monroe_County_Board_of_Education gptkb:Cannon_v._University_of_Chicago gptkb:Gebser_v._Lago_Vista_Independent_School_District
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Birmingham_Board_of_Education
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:Title_IX_of_the_Education_Amendments_of_1972
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Title_IX:_Miscellaneous_Provisions
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7