|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:religion
essay
pseudoscience
|
|
gptkbp:arguesAgainst
|
gptkb:natural_selection
|
|
gptkbp:associatedWith
|
gptkb:Discovery_Institute
|
|
gptkbp:compatibleWith
|
mainstream science
|
|
gptkbp:contrastsWith
|
biologist
|
|
gptkbp:criticizedFor
|
gptkb:learned_society
|
|
gptkbp:emergedIn
|
late 20th century
|
|
gptkbp:focusesOn
|
irreducible complexity
specified complexity
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Intelligent design
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District
|
|
gptkbp:mainProponent
|
gptkb:Phillip_E._Johnson
gptkb:Michael_Behe
gptkb:William_Dembski
|
|
gptkbp:opposedBy
|
US federal courts as science
|
|
gptkbp:promotedIn
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:proposedBy
|
certain features of the universe and living things are best explained by an intelligent cause
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
mythology
|
|
gptkbp:requires
|
life is too complex to have evolved solely by natural processes
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Conservative_Christians
gptkb:Not_in_Our_Classrooms:_Why_Intelligent_Design_Is_Wrong_for_Our_Schools
gptkb:Seeking_God_in_Science:_An_Atheist_Defends_Intelligent_Design
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|