Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
GPTKB entity
Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:affects |
long-term effects on education policy
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
increased scrutiny of science education
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
no appeal filed
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed in law schools
remains relevant in discussions of education and law. used in legal and educational discussions |
| gptkbp:case_number |
04cv2688
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
intelligent design is not science
ruled against teaching intelligent design declaration of unconstitutional policy detailed opinion on the nature of science ruled that intelligent design is a form of creationism |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark case in education law
|
| gptkbp:community_feedback |
mixed responses from the community
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
set precedent for future cases
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Tammy_Kitzmiller
gptkb:Dover_Area_School_District gptkb:United_States_federal_law gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Middle_District_of_Pennsylvania |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2005
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Middle_District_of_Pennsylvania |
| gptkbp:decision_written_by |
gptkb:Judge_John_E._Jones_III
|
| gptkbp:duration |
several weeks of trial
|
| gptkbp:educational_value |
changed how evolution is taught in schools
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
December 20, 2005
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
part of the evolution vs. creationism debate
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced education policy
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
parents and students
|
| gptkbp:is_debated_in |
sparked public debate on science education
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:John_E._Jones_III
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
intelligent design
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
affirmed the teaching of evolution
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:Dover,_Pennsylvania
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive media coverage during trial
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
intelligent design not science
influenced other school districts intelligent design not a scientific theory |
| gptkbp:precedent |
cited in future legal arguments
established legal standards for teaching evolution |
| gptkbp:public_interest |
high public interest in the case
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
widely covered in media
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Edwards_v._Aguillard
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
evolution education
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
discussed in academic journals
|
| gptkbp:school_board_policy |
required teaching of intelligent design
|
| gptkbp:significance |
separation of church and state
|
| gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
scientific evidence against intelligent design
|
| gptkbp:witnesses |
biologists and educators
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:The_State_of_Tennessee_v._John_Thomas_Scopes
gptkb:Discovery_Institute |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|