Ingraham v. Wright, 432 U.S. 43 (1977)

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	1976-11-02
gptkbp:citation	432 U.S. 651
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkbp:date	1977-04-19
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:Willie_J._Wright,_Jr.
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Justice_Byron_White gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall
gptkbp:docketNumber	75-6527
gptkbp:fullName	James Ingraham et al. v. Willie J. Wright, Jr., et al.
gptkbp:heldBy	Due process does not require notice and a hearing prior to the imposition of corporal punishment in public schools. Corporal punishment in public schools does not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Ingraham v. Wright, 432 U.S. 43 (1977)
gptkbp:legalImpact	Established that corporal punishment in public schools is not unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Florida
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr.
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:James_Ingraham
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution gptkb:Eighth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkbp:subject	corporal punishment in public schools
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:432_U.S._43_(1977)
gptkbp:bfsLayer	8