|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
135 U.S. 1
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
April 15, 1890
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:David_J._Brewer
Lucius Q.C. Lamar
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
In re Neagle, Petitioner
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Federal officers are immune from state prosecution for acts performed in the course of their federal duties
The Attorney General has authority to assign U.S. Marshals to protect federal judges
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
In re Neagle
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Joseph_P._Bradley
gptkb:Horace_Gray
gptkb:John_M._Harlan
gptkb:Melville_Fuller
gptkb:Samuel_Blatchford
gptkb:Stephen_J._Field
Lucius Q.C. Lamar
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Samuel_Blatchford
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
1
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
gptkb:Supremacy_Clause
federal protection of judicial officers
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Terry_v._United_States
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_J._Field
David Neagle
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
separation of powers
federal supremacy
federal officer immunity
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
135
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_J._Field
gptkb:David_S._Terry
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
8
|