gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:area
|
gptkb:intellectual_property
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
appeal
|
gptkbp:concluded_on
|
not patentable
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
October 30, 2008
en banc
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
2007-1130
|
gptkbp:impact
|
software patents
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
Supreme Court decisions
|
gptkbp:involves
|
business methods
|
gptkbp:is_applied_in
|
gptkb:USPTO
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
545 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by
|
machine-or-transformation test
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
affirmed the lower court's decision
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
Judges Lourie, Gajarsa, and Dyk
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
patentable subject matter
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
Patent Act
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
reaffirmed the machine-or-transformation test
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
patent eligibility
|
gptkbp:propulsion
|
gptkb:Bernard_Bilski
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:Bilski_v._Kappos
|
gptkbp:responds_to
|
gptkb:David_Kappos
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on patent law
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|