Statements (108)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:legal_case |
gptkbp:argued_on |
November 9, 2009
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
debate over judicial activism
debate over patent scope debate over abstract ideas debate over business method patents debate over competitive advantage debate over economic growth debate over economic implications debate over economic implications of patents debate over economic incentives debate over innovation incentives debate over innovation policy debate over intellectual property rights debate over legal certainty debate over legal frameworks debate over legal standards debate over market dynamics debate over patent litigation debate over patent system integrity debate over patent system reforms debate over public policy debate over technological advancement debate over technological innovation |
gptkbp:case_number |
08-964
|
gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
5-4 decision influenced patent application processes significant for business methods |
gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:intellectual_property
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court June 28, 2010 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Stevens gptkb:Justice_Breyer |
gptkbp:followed_by |
gptkb:Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Bilski v. Kappos
|
gptkbp:impact |
patent law reforms
business method patents |
gptkbp:influenced_by |
Federal Circuit Court decisions
|
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:David_Kappos
gptkb:Bernard_Bilski |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
561 U. S. 593
561 U. S. 593 (2010) |
gptkbp:judicial_review |
judicial interpretation of patent eligibility
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
U. S. patent system
U. S. patent law |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
patent eligibility
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
machine-or-transformation test
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Wilmer_Hale
impact on innovation impact on startups impact on pharmaceutical patents impact on biotechnology patents impact on patent applications impact on academic patents impact on business models impact on consumer products patents impact on financial services patents impact on healthcare patents impact on intellectual property rights impact on international patent law impact on investment in R& D impact on manufacturing patents impact on open source software impact on patent litigation impact on patent office practices impact on patent strategy impact on patent trolls impact on research patents impact on service patents impact on software patents impact on technology sector impact on trade secrets |
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Leahy-Smith_America_Invents_Act
gptkb:America_Invents_Act Patent Act of 1952 |
gptkbp:notable_for |
gptkb:United_States_Patent_and_Trademark_Office
gptkb:Electronic_Frontier_Foundation gptkb:American_Intellectual_Property_Law_Association gptkb:Intellectual_Property_Owners_Association gptkb:Business_Software_Alliance |
gptkbp:outcome |
reversed and remanded
affirmed the Federal Circuit's decision |
gptkbp:preceded_by |
gptkb:KSR_International_Co._v._Teleflex_Inc.
|
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Laboratories
gptkb:Association_for_Molecular_Pathology_v._Myriad_Genetics machine-or-transformation test |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas |
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Laboratories
gptkb:Association_for_Molecular_Pathology_v._Myriad_Genetics gptkb:Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International gptkb:In_re_Comiskey gptkb:In_re_Bilski |
gptkbp:related_to |
patent law
Section 101 of the Patent Act |
gptkbp:significance |
clarified patentable subject matter
clarified the standard for patent eligibility |
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Federal_Circuit
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|