Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 482 U.S. 578 (1988)

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	December 2, 1987
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:482_U.S._578 First Amendment jurisprudence
gptkbp:date	1988
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:decisionAnnounced	February 24, 1988
gptkbp:heldBy	Public figures cannot recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress without showing that the publication contained a false statement of fact made with actual malice.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 482 U.S. 578 (1988)
gptkbp:legalIssue	gptkb:First_Amendment Intentional infliction of emotional distress
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkbp:overturnedLowerCourt	gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fourth_Circuit
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Hustler_Magazine,_Inc.
gptkbp:predecessor	protection of parody under the First Amendment
gptkbp:relatedTo	freedom of speech satire public figure doctrine
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Jerry_Falwell
gptkbp:subject	satirical advertisement
gptkbp:unanimousDecision	true
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:482_U.S._578
gptkbp:bfsLayer	8