|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
497 U.S. 417
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 25, 1990
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
No. 88-1125
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
A two-parent notification requirement for a minor's abortion is unconstitutional unless there is a judicial bypass option.
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Minnesota
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
subsequent abortion law cases
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
judicial bypass requirement for parental notification laws
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
parental consent laws
abortion in the United States
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:abortion_law
parental notification
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:503_U.S._540
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Hodgson v. Minnesota
|