Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil rights case
16-41034 |
| gptkbp:context |
U. S.-Mexico border issues
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2017
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hernandez v. Mesa
|
| gptkbp:impact |
civil rights litigation
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
881 F.3d 518
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Javier_Hernandez
Jesse Mesa |
| gptkbp:judging_criteria |
dismissed claims against federal agents
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:majority_opinion
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
excessive force
Fourth Amendment rights three-judge panel government immunity jurisdiction issues cross-border shooting excessive force standard federal agent liability unreasonable seizure |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:political_movement
gptkb:law_firm_of_Arnold_&_Porter |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:El_Paso,_Texas
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Ziglar_v._Abbasi
gptkb:Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:legislation
gptkb:legal_reforms gptkb:Embassy policy reforms public policy advocacy human rights discussions law enforcement training community relations law enforcement policies judicial accountability public perception of law enforcement immigration policy discussions community safety concerns advocacy for victims' rights civil liberties discussions border security debates constitutional law interpretation federal jurisdiction debates legal standards for use of force border patrol practices court ruled in favor of Mesa qualified immunity upheld |
| gptkbp:precedent |
impact on cross-border law enforcement cases
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Judge_Stephen_A._Higginson
gptkb:Judge_James_L._Dennis |
| gptkbp:significance |
qualified immunity
|