|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
86-836
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
upheld school district's decision
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_William_Brennan
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
87-1270
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
January 13, 1988
|
|
gptkbp:election
|
5-3
|
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for
|
gptkb:educational_institutions
journalism education
administrative control
First Amendment jurisprudence
student expression policies
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
school-sponsored publications
|
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
gptkb:First_Amendment
freedom of speech
freedom of the press
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Catherine_Kuhlmeier
gptkb:Hazelwood_School_District
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
484 U. S. 260 (1988)
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
school governance
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
First Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:notable_quote
|
“ The school must be able to set high standards for student speech.”
“ A school need not tolerate student speech that is inconsistent with its basic educational mission.”
“ Educators do not offend the First Amendment by exercising editorial control.”
“ The school newspaper is not a public forum.”
“ The First Amendment does not require schools to promote particular types of student speech.”
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
School officials can exercise editorial control
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
student journalism rights
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District
gptkb:Bethel_School_District_No._403_v._Fraser
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Limits student free speech rights in schools
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|