Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764 (1993)

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	509 U.S. 764
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Stevens gptkb:Chief_Justice_Rehnquist gptkb:Justice_Souter gptkb:Justice_Blackmun gptkb:Justice_White
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	1993
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_O'Connor gptkb:Justice_Scalia gptkb:Justice_Thomas
gptkbp:heldBy	U.S. antitrust laws can apply to foreign conduct that was meant to produce and did produce some substantial effect in the United States.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764 (1993)
gptkbp:legalSubject	gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act antitrust law
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Souter
gptkbp:petitioner	Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
gptkbp:response	gptkb:State_of_California
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Hartford_Insurance_(1970)
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7