Statements (43)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 11-681
Labor law case |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
573 U.S. 616
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 30, 2014 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Harris v. Quinn
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Public sector employees
Collective bargaining rights Union membership fees |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justices_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justices_Kagan Justices Breyer |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
January 21, 2014
Union security agreements State laws on union fees Challenges to union practices Influences future labor law cases Public sector labor relations First_Amendment_rights First_Amendment_implications Court_ruled_against_mandatory_union_fees |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Landmark decision in labor law
First major case on union fees since Abood Reevaluation_of_union_power_in_the_U.S. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Non-union members cannot be compelled to pay fees
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Pamela_Harris
Illinois_Homecare_Providers |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justices_Roberts
gptkb:Justices_Scalia gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justices_Kennedy gptkb:Justices_Thomas |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Impact on public sector unions
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Support from conservative groups
Opposition from labor unions Mixed reactions from labor groups |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Janus_v._AFSCME
gptkb:Abood_v._Detroit_Board_of_Education |
| gptkbp:significance |
Limits union power in public sector
|