Haaland v. Brackeen

GPTKB entity

Statements (35)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:affects state child welfare laws
Native American child adoption
gptkbp:category United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
United States Native American case law
2023 in United States case law
gptkbp:citation 599 U.S. ___ (2023)
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkbp:country gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date 2023-06-15
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:docketNumber 21-376
gptkbp:fullName Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Chad Everet Brackeen, et al.
gptkbp:heldBy The Indian Child Welfare Act does not violate the Constitution.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Haaland v. Brackeen
gptkbp:legalIssue federalism
equal protection
anti-commandeering doctrine
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Amy_Coney_Barrett
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Ketanji_Brown_Jackson
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkbp:petitioner gptkb:Deb_Haaland
gptkbp:precededBy Brackeen v. Haaland (lower court case)
gptkbp:relatedLegislation gptkb:Indian_Child_Welfare_Act
gptkbp:response Chad Everet Brackeen
gptkbp:subject gptkb:Indian_Child_Welfare_Act
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Indian_Child_Welfare_Act
gptkbp:bfsLayer 8