Grayned v. City of Rockford

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	1972-01-17 1972-01-18
gptkbp:citation	408 U.S. 104
gptkbp:date	1972-05-15
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkbp:fullName	Richard Grayned v. City of Rockford
gptkbp:heldBy	The anti-noise ordinance was not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. The anti-picketing ordinance was unconstitutionally vague.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Grayned v. City of Rockford
gptkbp:joinedBy	gptkb:Byron_White gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr. gptkb:William_O._Douglas gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell_Jr. gptkb:Warren_E._Burger gptkb:Potter_Stewart gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkbp:legalSubject	gptkb:Due_Process_Clause gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution Freedom of expression Vagueness doctrine
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Rockford,_Illinois
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkbp:pages	104
gptkbp:petitioner	Richard Grayned
gptkbp:predecessor	First Amendment overbreadth analysis vagueness doctrine jurisprudence
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Papachristou_v._City_of_Jacksonville Coates v. City of Cincinnati
gptkbp:response	gptkb:City_of_Rockford
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:constitutional_law Freedom of speech Civil liberties Vagueness doctrine
gptkbp:volume	408
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Vagueness_in_Law
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6