|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
October 2020
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
18-957
Supreme Court granted certiorari
Supreme Court heard oral arguments
Supreme Court issued opinion
initially filed in 2010
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in favor of Oracle
trial court ruled in favor of Oracle
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
reversed lower court decision
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decision_announced_on
|
April 5, 2021
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
20-1334
|
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
influenced software licensing practices
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
gptkb:2021
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Google v. Oracle America
|
|
gptkbp:innovation
|
encouraged open-source development
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:Google
Oracle America
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
141 S. Ct. 1183
2021 U. S. LEXIS 1975
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:Justice_Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
copyright law
fair use
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
Kirkland & Ellis for Google
Morrison & Foerster for Oracle
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act
gptkb:Copyright_Act_of_1976
|
|
gptkbp:notable_production
|
clarified use of APIs
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Google's use of Java API was fair use
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
affects future copyright cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
opposed by copyright holders
supported by civil liberties organizations
supported by tech companies
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google_LLC
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on software development
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Telegram
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|