Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Bucklew_v._Precythe
gptkb:Baze_v._Rees |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
June 29, 2015 |
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
States using midazolam
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Evolving standards of decency
Supreme Court's role in death penalty cases Public opinion on capital punishment Death penalty history in the U. S. Legal precedents affecting capital punishment |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Glossip v. Gross
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Lethal injection protocols
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Richard_Glossip
gptkb:Robert_Mc_Coy |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:legal_case
Criminal law Administrative law |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Cruel and unusual punishment
Method of execution Constitutionality of lethal injection Death penalty and lethal injection Death penalty in the United States Efficacy of midazolam Risk of pain during execution |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Baze_v._Rees
gptkb:Caldwell_v._Mississippi Legal challenges in various states Influence on Supreme Court jurisprudence Impact on state legislation Challenges to lethal injection protocols |
| gptkbp:outcome |
5-4 ruling
Set precedent for future cases Confirmed legality of midazolam Court upheld the use of midazolam Reaffirmed death penalty practices |
| gptkbp:precedent |
future death penalty cases
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor Controversial decision Concerns over execution methods Debate over death penalty |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Public policy discussions
Impact on criminal justice system Legal implications of the ruling Human rights implications Ethical considerations of lethal injection |
| gptkbp:significance |
Addressed Eighth Amendment concerns
|