Fortas v. California

GPTKB entity

Statements (51)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseOutcome Defendant's rights upheld
Changed perceptions of legal counsel
Conviction overturned due to lack of counsel
Significant for public defense rights
Broadened_access_to_legal_resources
gptkbp:caseTypes No. 64
Criminal law case
Legal analysis publications
gptkbp:citedBy 384 U.S. 436
gptkbp:consequences Access to justice
gptkbp:court Unanimous decision
Justices_Brennan,_White,_and_others
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 22, 1965
gptkbp:filedIn March 30, 1965
gptkbp:historicalContext gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
gptkbp:historicalEvent Part of a series of landmark cases
Part_of_legal_history_in_the_U.S.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Fortas v. California
gptkbp:impact Strengthened right to legal representation
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
Constitutional review
Concern over judicial overreach
Majority opinion emphasized fairness
Strengthened_the_Sixth_Amendment
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:United_States_federal_law
gptkbp:lawEnforcement Critical for understanding legal rights
gptkbp:legalStatus Constitutional law
Due process
Right to counsel
Public defender
Expanded rights of defendants
Affirmed the right to counsel in state courts
Establishment of public defense systems
gptkbp:notableFeature Available in legal archives
Influenced future legal standards
Used in legal education
Still cited in legal arguments today
Examined the role of counsel
Influenced public policy on legal aid
Reviewed in law schools
Supreme_Court_archives
gptkbp:outcome Reversed conviction
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation gptkb:Fortas,_California
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Gideon_v._Wainwright
Right to free legal counsel
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Argersinger_v._Hamlin
gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona
Set standards for legal representation