Statements (23)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:area |
contract law
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[1884] UKHL 1, (1884) 9 App Cas 605
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
1884
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
Mrs. Beer
|
| gptkbp:fullTitle |
Foakes v Beer [1884] UKHL 1
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Foakes v Beer
|
| gptkbp:impact |
established rule on part payment of debts in English law
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
|
| gptkbp:key |
A promise to accept part payment of a debt in full satisfaction is not binding unless supported by fresh consideration.
|
| gptkbp:leadingJudges |
Lord Blackburn
Lord Selborne Lord Watson |
| gptkbp:numberOfIssues |
consideration in contract law
|
| gptkbp:overruledBy |
no
|
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
Dr. John Foakes
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
Pinnel's Case
|
| gptkbp:principle |
part payment of debt is not satisfaction for the whole
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Pinnel's Case
Williams v Roffey Bros |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:English_contract_law
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|