Statements (85)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Constitution
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Constitution_of_Ireland_(1937)
|
| gptkbp:addresses |
Party switching.
|
| gptkbp:affects |
gptkb:political_party
Political culture. Political representation. Electoral outcomes. Electoral processes. Influenced future amendments. Legislative integrity. Voter trust. |
| gptkbp:aims_to |
strengthen the provisions for the disqualification of members of Parliament and State Legislatures
|
| gptkbp:amended_by |
None.
Article 368 |
| gptkbp:applies_to |
Current political landscape.
Members of Parliament and State Legislatures. |
| gptkbp:associated_with |
Political reforms.
Rajiv Gandhi's government. Rajiv Gandhi's political ideology. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Increased party discipline.
|
| gptkbp:contributed_to |
Political accountability.
Democratic processes. |
| gptkbp:controversy |
Debate over its effectiveness in curbing defections.
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
gptkb:1985
|
| gptkbp:enacted_by |
gptkb:1985
|
| gptkbp:enforces |
gptkb:Election_Commission_of_India
|
| gptkbp:examines |
Legal studies.
Political analysis. Political analysts. Constitutional experts. Constitutional scholars. Political studies. |
| gptkbp:goal |
To promote party loyalty.
|
| gptkbp:governing_body |
Passed by a simple majority.
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Post-Emergency period in India.
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
Political forums.
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Marked a shift in Indian politics.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Fifty-second Amendment
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Political alliances.
Increased stability in the political system. Political dynamics in India. |
| gptkbp:includes |
Tenth Schedule
|
| gptkbp:includes_provisions_for |
Disqualification on grounds of defection.
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
Political instability in the 1970s and 1980s.
|
| gptkbp:influences |
Electoral strategies.
Legislative behavior. Party strategies. Political behavior. Political party behavior. |
| gptkbp:introduced |
gptkb:Rajiv_Gandhi
|
| gptkbp:is_analyzed_in |
Political science research.
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Legal judgments.
|
| gptkbp:is_discussed_in |
Constitutional law.
Legal forums. Political discourse. Parliamentary debates. Legal circles. |
| gptkbp:is_linked_to |
Political stability.
Electoral reforms. Political reforms in India. |
| gptkbp:is_subject_to |
Constitutional scrutiny.
|
| gptkbp:issues |
Political corruption.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Subject to judicial review.
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Representation_of_the_People_Act,_1951
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu.
|
| gptkbp:notable_for |
Its impact on party politics.
Its role in anti-defection legislation. Its role in shaping party politics. Its significance in Indian politics. |
| gptkbp:part_of |
gptkb:Constitution_of_India
|
| gptkbp:passes_through |
gptkb:government_agency
|
| gptkbp:political_position |
To curb political opportunism.
|
| gptkbp:promotes |
Political stability.
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
Mixed responses from political analysts.
|
| gptkbp:regulatory_body |
Parliament.
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
Political accountability.
Electoral integrity. Political loyalty. Political reforms in India. anti-defection law |
| gptkbp:repealed_by |
gptkb:None
|
| gptkbp:requires |
Disqualification of members who defect.
|
| gptkbp:signed_by |
gptkb:Politician
|
| gptkbp:significance |
It provides a mechanism to prevent political defections.
|