Statements (102)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
December 1, 2014
|
| gptkbp:argument_presented_by |
Prosecutors
First Amendment advocates |
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Implications for law enforcement
Implications for future cases Implications for civil liberties Implications for public safety Implications for free speech Implications for judicial interpretation Implications for mental health considerations Implications for online behavior Implications for social media platforms |
| gptkbp:case_number |
13-983
Appealed from the Third Circuit Court |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
Defendant's conviction overturned Reevaluation of threat criteria |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Clarified legal definitions of threats
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced future cases on free speech
Influenced future threat assessment cases |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 1, 2015 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
13-983
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Elonis v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_public_discourse |
Debate on online speech
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
Social media dynamics
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Anthony_Elonis |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
575 U. S. 723 (2015)
|
| gptkbp:is_debated_in |
Intent behind the communication
|
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
Subjective intent standard
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
First Amendment rights
Online speech and social media |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
True threat standard
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Judicial_review
gptkb:Constitution Freedom of speech First Amendment rights Privacy laws Public safety concerns Hate speech laws Ethics in law Free speech protections Constitutional protections Victim rights First Amendment jurisprudence Cybersecurity laws Judicial precedent Social media policy Speech regulation Defamation laws Cyberbullying laws Legal definitions of threats Impact on digital rights advocacy Mens rea Criminal threats Digital communication laws Digital footprint implications First Amendment challenges Impact on free speech advocacy Intentional infliction of emotional distress Judicial interpretation of threats Legal definitions of harassment Legal discourse on threats Legal frameworks for online behavior Legal implications of social media use Legal liability in digital communication Legal protections for minors Legal ramifications of online speech Legal standards for online communication Legal standards for threats Online harassment laws Public perception of threats Social media implications Threat assessment standards Potential changes in threat laws Threatening communications |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
Extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Reversed and remanded
Reversed conviction |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Virginia_v._Black
Set precedent for future threat assessments Subjective intent in threats Intent in threat cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
5-4 decision
Justice Alito's opinion |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Controversial case
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Virginia_v._Black
gptkb:Watts_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:related_event |
Public demonstrations
Supreme Court oral arguments |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Analyzed in legal journals
|
| gptkbp:significance |
First Amendment implications
Clarified standards for online threats Impact on online speech and threats |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|