EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. (2014)

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:category	gptkb:2014_in_United_States_case_law Environmental law case
gptkbp:citation	572 U.S. 489
gptkbp:date	April 29, 2014
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas Samuel Alito (in part)
gptkbp:docketNumber	12-1182
gptkbp:fullName	Environmental Protection Agency et al. v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., et al.
gptkbp:heldBy	EPA's method for allocating emission reductions among upwind states is a permissible, workable, and equitable interpretation of the Clean Air Act.
gptkbp:historicalPeriod	United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. (2014)
gptkbp:joinedBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Elena_Kagan gptkb:Stephen_Breyer Samuel Alito (in part)
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Environmental_Protection_Agency
gptkbp:relatedLegislation	gptkb:Clean_Air_Act
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Michigan_v._EPA
gptkbp:response	EME Homer City Generation, L.P.
gptkbp:significance	Upheld EPA's authority to regulate interstate air pollution under the Clean Air Act
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:Clean_Air_Act gptkb:Cross-State_Air_Pollution_Rule
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Cross-State_Air_Pollution_Rule
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7