Texas v. Pennsylvania (election lawsuit)

E932096

United States Supreme Court case election lawsuit original jurisdiction case

Texas v. Pennsylvania was a high-profile 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case in which Texas sought to overturn presidential election results in several battleground states, ultimately being rejected for lack of standing.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Disambiguation Statements Elicitation Referenced by

All labels observed (3)

Label	Occurrences
Texas v. Pennsylvania (election lawsuit) canonical	1
Texas v. Pennsylvania, 592 U.S. ___ (2020)	1
Texas v. Pennsylvania, et al.	1

How this entity was disambiguated

This entity first appeared as the object of triple T11531633 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: Texas v. Pennsylvania (election lawsuit)
Context triple: [2020–2021 United States presidential transition, notableCaseContext, Texas v. Pennsylvania (election lawsuit)]

A. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
B. Texas v. White
Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
C. Alabama v. Texas
Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
D. Branch v. Texas
Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
E. Trump v. Vance
Trump v. Vance is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas, allowing a New York grand jury to obtain Donald Trump’s financial records.
F. None of above. chosen
G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: Texas v. Pennsylvania (election lawsuit)
Target entity description: Texas v. Pennsylvania was a high-profile 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case in which Texas sought to overturn presidential election results in several battleground states, ultimately being rejected for lack of standing.

A. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
B. Texas v. White
Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
C. Alabama v. Texas
Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
D. Branch v. Texas
Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
E. Trump v. Vance
Trump v. Vance is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas, allowing a New York grand jury to obtain Donald Trump’s financial records.
F. None of above. chosen

Statements (49)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	United States Supreme Court case ⓘ election lawsuit ⓘ original jurisdiction case ⓘ
AlitoThomasPosition	would grant leave to file the complaint but grant no other relief ⓘ
category	2020 in United States case law ⓘ United States Supreme Court cases ⓘ United States election-related litigation ⓘ
characterization	attempt to overturn 2020 presidential election results in several battleground states ⓘ
citation	Texas v. Pennsylvania, 592 U.S. ___ (2020) ⓘ linked to: Texas v. Pennsylvania (election lawsuit)
constitutionalProvisionInvoked	Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ Article III of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ linked to: Article III of the United States Constitution
court	Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
dateDecided	2020-12-11 ⓘ
dateFiled	2020-12-07 ⓘ
decisionType	per curiam order ⓘ
defendant	Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ⓘ linked to: Pennsylvania State of Georgia ⓘ linked to: Georgia State of Michigan ⓘ linked to: Michigan State of Wisconsin ⓘ linked to: Wisconsin
docketNumber	155, Original ⓘ
fullName	Texas v. Pennsylvania, et al. ⓘ linked to: Texas v. Pennsylvania (election lawsuit)
holding	Texas lacked standing under Article III to challenge the election procedures of other states ⓘ
impact	left certified 2020 presidential election results in defendant states intact ⓘ
legalIssue	Article II of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ linked to: Article II of the United States Constitution Electors Clause of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ alleged unconstitutional changes to election procedures ⓘ standing ⓘ
mediaCoverage	widely covered by U.S. and international media ⓘ
opposingParty	District of Columbia and additional states filing in opposition ⓘ attorneys general of the defendant states ⓘ
outcome	motion for leave to file bill of complaint denied ⓘ
partyRepresentative	Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ⓘ linked to: Ken Paxton
plaintiff	State of Texas ⓘ linked to: Texas
proceduralOutcome	no merits hearing held ⓘ
proceduralPosture	motion for leave to file bill of complaint in original jurisdiction ⓘ
relatesTo	2020 United States presidential election in Georgia ⓘ 2020 United States presidential election in Michigan ⓘ 2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania ⓘ linked to: 2020 United States presidential election 2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin ⓘ
reliefSought	blocking certification of presidential electors ⓘ invalidation of presidential election results in defendant states ⓘ remand of election of presidential electors to state legislatures ⓘ
separateStatementBy	Justice Clarence Thomas ⓘ linked to: Clarence Thomas Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ linked to: Samuel A. Alito Jr.
subjectMatter	2020 United States presidential election ⓘ
supportingParty	President Donald J. Trump (as intervenor or amicus supporter) ⓘ multiple Republican state attorneys general ⓘ
vote	9-0 on lack of standing to file the complaint ⓘ
year	2020 ⓘ