Albrecht v. Herald Co.
E530386
Albrecht v. Herald Co. is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that held maximum resale price maintenance to be per se illegal under the Sherman Act.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Albrecht v. Herald Co. canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5539332 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Albrecht v. Herald Co. Context triple: [The Antitrust Paradox, criticizes, Albrecht v. Herald Co.]
-
A.
Sherbert v. Verner
Sherbert v. Verner is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened protections for religious liberty by requiring strict scrutiny of government actions that substantially burden individuals’ religious practices.
-
B.
Eisner v. Macomber
Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
-
C.
United States v. Washington Post Co.
United States v. Washington Post Co. is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside New York Times Co. v. United States, upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers against prior restraint by the government.
-
D.
New York Times Co. v. United States
New York Times Co. v. United States is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, sharply limiting the government’s power to impose prior restraint on the media.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Albrecht v. Herald Co. Target entity description: Albrecht v. Herald Co. is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that held maximum resale price maintenance to be per se illegal under the Sherman Act.
-
A.
Sherbert v. Verner
Sherbert v. Verner is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened protections for religious liberty by requiring strict scrutiny of government actions that substantially burden individuals’ religious practices.
-
B.
Eisner v. Macomber
Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
-
C.
United States v. Washington Post Co.
United States v. Washington Post Co. is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside New York Times Co. v. United States, upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers against prior restraint by the government.
-
D.
New York Times Co. v. United States
New York Times Co. v. United States is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, sharply limiting the government’s power to impose prior restraint on the media.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Sherman Act case
ⓘ
U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ antitrust case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
antitrust law
ⓘ
competition law ⓘ |
| category |
United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court cases on antitrust law ⓘ |
| citation | 390 U.S. 145 ⓘ |
| citationStyle | Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145 (1968) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy |
Potter Stewart
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1968-05-20 ⓘ |
| decisionMethod | plenary review ⓘ |
| decisionType | majority decision ⓘ |
| dissentBy |
Hugo L. Black
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
John M. Harlan II NERFINISHED ⓘ Tom C. Clark NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 51 ⓘ |
| fullName | Albrecht v. Herald Co. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding | Maximum resale price maintenance is per se illegal under §1 of the Sherman Act. ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal law ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| laterTreatment | Per se rule on maximum resale price maintenance rejected in State Oil Co. v. Khan. ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
Sherman Act §1
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
maximum resale price maintenance ⓘ |
| legalRule | Agreements to fix maximum resale prices are per se violations of the Sherman Act. ⓘ |
| majorityJoinedBy |
Abe Fortas
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Earl Warren NERFINISHED ⓘ Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED ⓘ William O. Douglas NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Byron R. White NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| overruledBy | State Oil Co. v. Khan NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| overruledByYear | 1997 ⓘ |
| page | 145 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Albrecht NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentialStatus | overruled in part ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent | Herald Co. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| result | Judgment of the court of appeals reversed. ⓘ |
| statuteInterpreted | Sherman Antitrust Act NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
newspaper distribution
ⓘ
vertical price restraints ⓘ |
| volume | 390 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1968 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Albrecht v. Herald Co. Description of subject: Albrecht v. Herald Co. is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that held maximum resale price maintenance to be per se illegal under the Sherman Act.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.