Triple
T21497238
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Albrecht v. Herald Co. |
E530386
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullName |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Albrecht v. Herald Co. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Albrecht v. Herald Co. | Statement: [Albrecht v. Herald Co., fullName, Albrecht v. Herald Co.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Albrecht v. Herald Co. Context triple: [Albrecht v. Herald Co., fullName, Albrecht v. Herald Co.]
-
A.
Albrecht v. Herald Co.
chosen
Albrecht v. Herald Co. is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that held maximum resale price maintenance to be per se illegal under the Sherman Act.
-
B.
Sherbert v. Verner
Sherbert v. Verner is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened protections for religious liberty by requiring strict scrutiny of government actions that substantially burden individuals’ religious practices.
-
C.
Crowell v. Benson
Crowell v. Benson is a 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the constitutional limits of administrative agencies’ fact-finding powers and the scope of judicial review over administrative adjudications.
-
D.
Eisner v. Macomber
Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
-
E.
Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody is a landmark 1975 U.S. Supreme Court employment discrimination case that clarified back pay and validation standards for employment tests under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45bd15481909fba5910765cdda2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e9ea58faa08190ab9f60b0db3c425b |
completed | April 23, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:23 p.m.