Triple

T21497238
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Albrecht v. Herald Co. E530386 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Albrecht v. Herald Co. NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Albrecht v. Herald Co. | Statement: [Albrecht v. Herald Co., fullName, Albrecht v. Herald Co.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Albrecht v. Herald Co.
Context triple: [Albrecht v. Herald Co., fullName, Albrecht v. Herald Co.]
  • A. Albrecht v. Herald Co. chosen
    Albrecht v. Herald Co. is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that held maximum resale price maintenance to be per se illegal under the Sherman Act.
  • B. Sherbert v. Verner
    Sherbert v. Verner is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened protections for religious liberty by requiring strict scrutiny of government actions that substantially burden individuals’ religious practices.
  • C. Crowell v. Benson
    Crowell v. Benson is a 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the constitutional limits of administrative agencies’ fact-finding powers and the scope of judicial review over administrative adjudications.
  • D. Eisner v. Macomber
    Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
  • E. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
    Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody is a landmark 1975 U.S. Supreme Court employment discrimination case that clarified back pay and validation standards for employment tests under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c45bd15481909fba5910765cdda2 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e9ea58faa08190ab9f60b0db3c425b completed April 23, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:23 p.m.