Thomas v. Collins
E362103
Thomas v. Collins is a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that strengthened First Amendment protections for labor organizers by striking down a Texas law requiring union speakers to register before soliciting members.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Thomas v. Collins canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3488660 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thomas v. Collins Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Stone Court, includesCase, Thomas v. Collins]
-
A.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
B.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
C.
Marsh v. Chambers
Marsh v. Chambers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of legislative prayer, finding that opening legislative sessions with a state-funded chaplain’s invocation did not violate the Establishment Clause.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Cooley v. Board of Wardens
Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thomas v. Collins Target entity description: Thomas v. Collins is a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that strengthened First Amendment protections for labor organizers by striking down a Texas law requiring union speakers to register before soliciting members.
-
A.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
B.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
C.
Marsh v. Chambers
Marsh v. Chambers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of legislative prayer, finding that opening legislative sessions with a state-funded chaplain’s invocation did not violate the Establishment Clause.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Cooley v. Board of Wardens
Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
labor law case ⓘ landmark First Amendment case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
civil liberties
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ labor law ⓘ |
| citation | 323 U.S. 516 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInvolved |
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
surface form:
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
|
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1945-03-26 ⓘ |
| dissentingJustices |
Owen Josephus Roberts
ⓘ
surface form:
Owen J. Roberts
Robert H. Jackson ⓘ |
| doctrine |
First Amendment protections apply to labor organizers through the Fourteenth Amendment
ⓘ
heightened protection for speech related to labor organizing ⓘ |
| holding |
A Texas law requiring labor organizers to register before soliciting union members violated the First Amendment as applied through the Fourteenth Amendment
ⓘ
States may not impose prior restraints on the exercise of First Amendment rights by requiring registration before public speaking or solicitation of union membership ⓘ |
| impact |
limited state power to require permits or registration as a condition to public speaking on labor issues
ⓘ
strengthened First Amendment protections for labor organizers ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| languageOfDecision | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
freedom of assembly
ⓘ
freedom of association ⓘ freedom of speech ⓘ labor organizing ⓘ prior restraint ⓘ state regulation of union activity ⓘ |
| majorityJustices |
Felix Frankfurter
ⓘ
Frank Murphy ⓘ Justice Harlan F. Stone ⓘ
surface form:
Harlan F. Stone
Hugo L. Black ⓘ Stanley Reed ⓘ
surface form:
Stanley F. Reed
Wiley Rutledge ⓘ William O. Douglas ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Wiley Rutledge ⓘ |
| pageInUnitedStatesReports | 516 ⓘ |
| party |
Collins
ⓘ
Thomas ⓘ |
| relatedConcept |
prior restraint doctrine
ⓘ
solicitation of union membership as protected speech ⓘ speech on matters of public concern ⓘ |
| result | Texas registration requirement for labor organizers was struck down as unconstitutional ⓘ |
| stateLawChallenged | Texas statute regulating labor union solicitation ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
labor organizing and union solicitation
ⓘ
state police power and civil liberties ⓘ |
| typeOfRegulationChallenged | registration requirement for labor organizers ⓘ |
| volumeInUnitedStatesReports | 323 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1945 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Thomas v. Collins Description of subject: Thomas v. Collins is a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that strengthened First Amendment protections for labor organizers by striking down a Texas law requiring union speakers to register before soliciting members.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.