Dissent in California v. Texas
GPTKB entity
Statements (57)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
Legal Opinion
|
| gptkbp:author |
gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Kagan Justice Breyer |
| gptkbp:context |
Legal challenges to health care laws
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
The plaintiffs lacked standing
The_ACA_is_constitutional |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Dissent in California v. Texas
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Health care access
Insurance coverage |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional law
Constitutionality Standing Equity Administrative law Constitutional interpretation Federalism Health care policy Judicial review Separation of powers Health law Judicial accountability Judicial independence Statutory interpretation Due process Legal theory Legal frameworks Legal principles Legal precedent Precedent Public interest Legal interpretation Statutory law Judicial philosophy Legal standards Legal reasoning Judicial ethics Judicial activism Equal protection Judicial interpretation Insurance law Judicial restraint Public health law Administrative discretion Legislative intent Judicial review standards Constitutional challenges Health care law Judicial standards Legal doctrine Judicial principles Legal standing Judicial norms Severability |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Texas_v._United_States
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:California_v._Texas
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Influences future health care litigation
|