Diamond v. Chakrabarty

GPTKB entity

Properties (52)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseOutcome expanded patent eligibility
patent upheld
gptkbp:caseTypes civil case
No. 79-404
gptkbp:court gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
affirmed the patentability
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 16, 1980
gptkbp:field intellectual property
gptkbp:historicalContext 1970s biotechnology advancements
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Diamond v. Chakrabarty
gptkbp:impact influenced biotechnology patents
gptkbp:influenced biotechnology industry
gptkbp:involved genetically modified organisms
patent law
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
9 justices
gptkbp:legalStatus non-obviousness
novelty
Patent Act of 1952
35 U.S.C. § 101
35 U.S.C. § 102
35 U.S.C. § 103
35 U.S.C. § 112
447 U.S. 303 (1980)
whether a genetically modified bacterium is patentable
enablement
ethics of patenting life forms
expanded scope of patentable subject matter
increased patent filings in biotechnology
patent granted
utility requirement for patents
U.S._patent_system
gptkbp:material Pseudomonas putida
gptkbp:notableFeature analyzed by legal scholars
used in law school curricula
landmark decision in patent law
often cited in patent litigation
gptkbp:outcome patentability of living organisms
gptkbp:patentAssignee gptkb:Ananda_Mohan_Chakrabarty
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Funk_Brothers_Seed_Co._v._Kalo_Inoculant_Co.
set precedent for future biotechnology patents
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Laboratories
gptkb:Association_for_Molecular_Pathology_v._Myriad_Genetics
gptkb:Bilski_v._Kappos
gptkb:Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International
gptkbp:researchField genetic engineering
gptkbp:respondsTo Commissioner_of_Patents_and_Trademarks
gptkbp:signatories gptkb:J._Craig_Venter
gptkbp:significance first case to allow patenting of a living organism