|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:J.E.M._Ag_Supply,_Inc._v._Pioneer_Hi-Bred_International,_Inc.
gptkb:Association_for_Molecular_Pathology_v._Myriad_Genetics,_Inc.
447 U.S. 303
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1980-06-16
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:fullTitle
|
gptkb:Diamond,_Commissioner_of_Patents_and_Trademarks_v._Chakrabarty
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
A live, human-made microorganism is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Diamond v. Chakrabarty
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
expanded scope of patentable subject matter
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
patentability of genetically modified organisms
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Warren_E._Burger
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:overturnedPriorCase
|
gptkb:In_re_Bergy_(C.C.P.A._1979)
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Sidney_A._Diamond
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
patenting of living organisms
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
genetically engineered bacteria
biotechnology patent law
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Ananda_Mohan_Chakrabarty
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
oil-eating bacterium
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:1980_in_American_law
gptkb:Section_101
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|