Statements (41)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Affected future hearsay rulings
Statements were inadmissible |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law
No. 05-5224 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
547 U.S. 813
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkb:State_of_Washington gptkb:Michael_Davis Reversed and remanded |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 19, 2006 |
| gptkbp:effectiveDate |
June 19, 2006
|
| gptkbp:filedIn |
gptkb:Paul_D._Clement
December 5, 2005 |
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Appealed_from_Washington_State_Supreme_Court
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Davis v. Washington
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced subsequent cases regarding hearsay
|
| gptkbp:judges |
9 Justices
Justice Clarence Thomas Supreme_Court_review |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Public Defender
Confrontation Clause Domestic violence case Statements made in the course of police interrogation are testimonial Established criteria for testimonial statements Statements made during emergency situations are not testimonial. |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Examined the nature of statements made to law enforcement
Relevant to criminal procedure Used_in_law_schools_for_Confrontation_Clause_discussions Influenced_the_interpretation_of_the_Confrontation_Clause |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Statements made to police were testimonial
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Crawford_v._Washington
Impact on hearsay evidence in criminal cases |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Hammon_v._Indiana
Sixth Amendment Right to confront witnesses |
| gptkbp:research |
Hearsay
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified the definition of testimonial statements
|