|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
547 U.S. 813
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2006-06-19
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
05-5224
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Adrian Martell Davis v. Washington
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Statements are nontestimonial when made in the course of police interrogation under circumstances objectively indicating that the primary purpose is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency.
Statements are testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no such ongoing emergency, and that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Davis v. Washington
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
Hammon v. Indiana
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment
gptkb:Confrontation_Clause
testimonial evidence
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Confrontation_Clause
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|