Statements (27)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
2016 SCC 12
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:Canada
|
| gptkbp:date |
2016-04-14
|
| gptkbp:decision |
Métis and non-status Indians are 'Indians' under section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_Canada
Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development |
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
35945
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Clarified federal government responsibility for Métis and non-status Indians
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:legalCitation |
[2016] 1 S.C.R. 99
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
Whether Métis and non-status Indians are 'Indians' under section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867
|
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
Gabriel Daniels
Harry Daniels Leopold High Eagle |
| gptkbp:predecessor |
Recognition of Métis and non-status Indians as federal responsibility
|
| gptkbp:province |
Federal (Canada-wide)
|
| gptkbp:relatedGroup |
gptkb:Cree
Non-status Indians |
| gptkbp:relatedLegislation |
gptkb:Constitution_Act,_1867
|
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:constitutional_law
gptkb:Indigenous_people |
| gptkbp:unanimousDecision |
gptkb:Justice_Rosalie_Abella
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Métis_people_in_Alberta
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Daniels v Canada
|