Constitutional Tribunal of Poland
GPTKB entity
Properties (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
Constitutional court
|
| gptkbp:administrativeDivision |
gptkb:Sejm_of_Poland
|
| gptkbp:associated_with |
Public engagement initiatives
Tension over rule of law |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Protection of human rights
Disputes over the constitutionality of laws Disputes between central constitutional authorities Interpretation_of_the_Constitution |
| gptkbp:challenges |
International relations
Legal reforms Public trust Political pressures Maintaining independence |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:Poland
|
| gptkbp:court |
Abortion law ruling 2020
Constitutionality of the 2015 law on the Tribunal Constitutionality of the 2016 law on the Tribunal Judicial independence ruling 2019 |
| gptkbp:cultural_impact |
Controversial debates
|
| gptkbp:current_use |
Public protests
Political influence concerns International criticism Judicial_reforms_in_Poland |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
binding
|
| gptkbp:established |
1985
|
| gptkbp:function |
Advisory opinions
Interpretation of laws Resolution of disputes Protection of civil rights Protection of democracy Guardian_of_the_Constitution |
| gptkbp:headquarters |
gptkb:Warsaw
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Constitutional Tribunal of Poland
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Significant
Influence_on_EU_jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:is_a_platform_for |
gptkb:Constitution_of_Poland
|
| gptkbp:issuedBy |
gptkb:President_of_Poland
|
| gptkbp:judges |
15
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Constitutional review
Comparative studies |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Engagement in legal discourse
|
| gptkbp:localGovernment |
Controversial
|
| gptkbp:mediaAppearances |
Media coverage of rulings
|
| gptkbp:president |
Julia Przyłębska
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
Yes
|
| gptkbp:website |
TrybunalKonstytucyjny.gov.pl
|