gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1997-02-19
|
gptkbp:citation
|
521 U.S. 507
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
|
gptkbp:date
|
1997-06-25
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Patrick_F._Flores
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
95-2076
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
City of Boerne, Petitioner v. Patrick F. Flores, Archbishop of San Antonio, and United States
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Congress exceeded its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers by enacting the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as applied to the states.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
City of Boerne v. Flores
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Limited the scope of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as applied to states
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Boerne,_Texas
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:City_of_Boerne
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Congress's enforcement powers under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment are limited to enforcing constitutional rights as defined by the Supreme Court.
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Employment_Division_v._Smith
gptkb:Gonzales_v._O_Centro_Espírita_Beneficente_União_do_Vegetal
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Federalism
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
gptkb:Separation_of_powers
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|