|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:affects
|
Nonprofit organizations
Corporate donations
Political action committees
Union contributions
|
|
gptkbp:area
|
Election law
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
gptkb:Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
Increased political spending by corporations
|
|
gptkbp:controversy
|
Political influence of money
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
January 21, 2010
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Citizens United ruling
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Campaign finance laws
|
|
gptkbp:influenced
|
2012 presidential election
2010 midterm elections
|
|
gptkbp:is_countered_by
|
gptkb:Mc_Connell_v._Federal_Election_Commission
gptkb:Austin_v._Michigan_Chamber_of_Commerce
|
|
gptkbp:is_criticized_for
|
Campaign finance reform advocates
|
|
gptkbp:is_supported_by
|
Business groups
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Federal Election Commission regulations
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
gptkb:Buckley_v._Valeo
Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Struck down limits on independent expenditures
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
First Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
Divided opinions
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
Super PA Cs
|
|
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis
|
Constitutional interpretation
Impact on democracy
Role of money in politics
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Expanded free speech rights
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:American_Tradition_Partnership_v._Bullock
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|