Statements (70)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:case_number |
20-1234
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2021
|
gptkbp:docket_number |
21-1234
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
June 2021
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Cherokee Nation v. Nash
|
gptkbp:impact |
tribal governance
state-tribal relations |
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Cherokee_Nation
gptkb:Nash |
gptkbp:judged_by |
affirmed lower court decision
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith Judge Johnson |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
tribal sovereignty
federal jurisdiction |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:human_rights
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:international_law gptkb:workers gptkb:federal_government gptkb:legal_case criminal law environmental law family law public policy civil rights self-determination constitutional law contract law judicial review appeals process property rights due process administrative law commercial law intellectual property law antitrust law tort law tax law real estate law administrative procedures intergovernmental relations treaty rights executive authority insurance law statutory interpretation equal protection legislative intent evidence law bankruptcy law sovereign immunity consumer protection law securities law trust law federal preemption procedure law tribal immunity jurisdictional boundaries |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Cherokee Nation legal team
Nash's legal counsel |
gptkbp:outcome |
ruling in favor of Cherokee Nation
|
gptkbp:precedent |
tribal law cases
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Oklahoma_Tax_Commission_v._Citizen_Band_Potawatomi_Indian_Tribe
gptkb:Mc_Clanahan_v._State_Tax_Commission_of_Arizona |
gptkbp:significance |
affirms tribal authority
|
gptkbp:sound |
March 2021
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Cherokee
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|