Chae Chan Ping v. United States
GPTKB entity
Statements (61)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Relevant to discussions on immigration reform
Implications for civil rights Used in law schools for immigration law Analysis of the ruling's impact on society Examined federal powers over immigration |
| gptkbp:case_documentation_source |
Supreme Court records
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
Appealed from lower court Documented in legal archives |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Affirmed lower court ruling
Influenced public opinion on immigration Affected Chinese immigrant communities Chae Chan Ping was denied re-entry Majority opinion favored government Marked a turning point in immigration law Reinforced exclusionary policies |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
First major immigration case
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Long-term effects on immigration law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan
Harlan argued for immigrant rights |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1889-05-06
|
| gptkbp:government_representation |
gptkb:U._S._government
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Chinese immigration to the United States
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Symbol of racial discrimination in law
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Chae Chan Ping v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future immigration policies
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Chae_Chan_Ping
gptkb:United_States |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
130 U. S. 581
|
| gptkbp:judicial_outcome_details |
Reinforced exclusion of Chinese immigrants
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Broad federal powers
Constitutionality of immigration laws |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy of exclusionary immigration policies
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Chinese_Exclusion_Act_of_1882
Context of 19th-century immigration debates |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Federal immigration policy
Strict constructionism Legal precedent established |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:immigration
Constitutional rights of immigrants |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Deportation upheld
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Plenary power doctrine
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Chinese immigrants
Constitutional interpretation of immigration laws |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Chinese_Exclusion_Act
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Upheld the Chinese Exclusion Act
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set precedent for future cases
Subsequent immigration restrictions Federal authority over immigration matters Foundation for future immigration cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_B._Woods
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark
Fong Yue Ting v. United States |
| gptkbp:significance |
Established precedent for federal immigration control
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Chinese_Exclusion_Act_of_1882
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|