Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
GPTKB entity
Properties (87)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
79-136
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
447 U.S. 557
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
June 19, 1980
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 30, 1980 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
November 19, 1979
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
free speech advocacy
advertising practices of utility companies business advertising rights legal standards for commercial advertising state regulations on commercial speech |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
|
| gptkbp:impact |
First_Amendment_rights
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr. gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:New_York
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:First_Amendment
public discourse consumer protection energy efficiency public interest advertising content advertising practices energy conservation energy transition commercial interests energy companies regulatory authority regulatory framework energy challenges government regulation energy distribution energy supply utility companies energy legislation energy policy energy sustainability utility services public utilities economic regulation energy infrastructure energy market advertising regulations advertising restrictions energy stakeholders utility rates utility regulation energy innovation energy advocacy free speech rights energy consumers energy regulation regulatory objectives commercial speech state regulation energy policy debates government interests commercial expression commercial speech doctrine energy future energy regulation debates four-part test for commercial speech government interest must be substantial regulation must directly advance the government interest marketplace of ideas test for commercial speech regulation utility advertising utility advertising restrictions regulation must not be more extensive than necessary commercial_speech_protected_under_the_First_Amendment |
| gptkbp:outcome |
regulation of advertising
regulation of commercial speech |
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Public_Service_Commission_of_New_York
gptkb:Central_Hudson_Gas_&_Electric_Corporation |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
commercial speech doctrine
subsequent commercial speech cases |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona
gptkb:Sorrell_v._IMS_Health_Inc. gptkb:Virginia_Board_of_Pharmacy_v._Virginia_Citizens_Consumer_Council gptkb:Thompson_v._Western_States_Medical_Center Lorillard_Tobacco_Co._v._Reilly |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on advertising regulations
|
| gptkbp:year |
1980
|