Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
GPTKB entity
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
20-107
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
unanimous decision
set precedent for similar cases influenced state legislation clarified legal standards influenced future regulations reaffirmed property rights affected land use regulations highlighted tensions between property rights and public access addressed public use doctrine impacted agricultural policies limited government access prompted discussions on property law reforms raised awareness of property rights issues revised interpretations of access rights strengthened property owner rights |
| gptkbp:case_types |
property law
constitutional law administrative law |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
20-107
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 23, 2021
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
|
| gptkbp:impact |
property access rights
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Cedar_Point_Nursery
gptkb:David_Hassid |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Amy_Coney_Barrett
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh gptkb:Justice_John_Roberts gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
eminent domain
government regulation agricultural access rights |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
property rights
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling in favor of Cedar Point Nursery
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Takings Clause
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
California agricultural law
|
| gptkbp:significance |
emphasizes property rights
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|