Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
GPTKB entity
Statements (30)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
gptkb:594_U.S._____(2021)
|
| gptkbp:date |
2021-06-23
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan gptkb:Stephen_Breyer |
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
20-107
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Cedar Point Nursery, et al. v. Victoria Hassid, et al.
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
California regulation granting union organizers access to agricultural employers’ property constitutes a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
Does a California regulation that grants labor organizations the right to take access to an agricultural employer’s property to solicit support for unionization constitute a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment?
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Amy_Coney_Barrett
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch gptkb:Samuel_Alito |
| gptkbp:originatedIn |
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
Cedar Point Nursery
Fowler Packing Company |
| gptkbp:precedentSet |
Expanded definition of per se physical takings under the Fifth Amendment.
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
California Agricultural Labor Relations Act
|
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:California_Agricultural_Labor_Relations_Board
Victoria Hassid |
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:trade_unionist
gptkb:Fifth_Amendment property rights |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Pacific_Legal_Foundation
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|